This is a perfect example of "The Male Gaze" theory that we
discussed today in class. The more I thought about, the more I realized that
this idea is so common throughout all types of media. Not only are these women
being objectified, but I could not think of a single example where the girl was
not either naked or in some type of sexy outfit.
What is "the gaze" exactly?
-- describes the act of looking; began as the study of the objectification of
women in visual texts. The issues involved when discussing "the gaze"
include the following:- the objectification of women-- seen as
objects
- the commonality of female nudity --
display implies subordination
- internalization of the gaze, changes
women's perceptions of themselves and makes them think of themselves as
objects
- shift to objectification as a source of
pleasure (for both the looker and the looked-at)
- men as the dominant group have been the looker (the subjects; women the objects)
The point about the source of pleasure for both the looker and the looked-at made me come to the realization that not only do the examples show women in nudity, but that they are getting pleasure out of being looked at and objectified. The idea of women putting on a performance for men makes the situation that much more dramatic.
In Arnie's Media Aesthetics class, we learned that the camera angle determines how the audience is going to interpret that particular frame. For this example with Megan Fox, I wonder how this theory would alter if the camera was simply more wide angled and included more in the frame instead of just her midsection. Would the audience members still feel as if they are taking on the role of the looker?